Finding God On The MARGIN


Please Note
The sections of this article in the yellow background
is taken almost word for word
with adaptations from the web page: http://www.lexpages.com/SGN/paschal/marginal.html
The article there was written as a beginning development of a spirituality for resigned and married catholic priests
based on the concept of marginality. 
What I have done is to take that same article
with its ideas and applied it to GLBT persons.
The article from which this is taken is called:
THE VALUE OF BEING MARGINAL
Notes Toward A Spirituality For Resigned Priests 
©Paschal Baute, 1994

The sections of the article in the peach background 
are my own further reflections as
this concept applies to GLBT persons.

           One of the most powerful experiences of Jesus' life was his identification with those who were marginalized, and his unwavering compassionate response to them. When we read the gospels from this point of view, we can discover much of value for us today, for those outside the centres of influence in society and church, and particularly for the GLBT person.

           What does it mean to be marginal? How do the marginalized see the world differently? Do the gospels and Jesus show us the value of being marginalized? What makes outsiders more perceptive? Do we need "the poor" for our conversion? How does a GLBT person respond to being marginalized? Does she/he have a special incentive for his/her own spiritual development?

           The margin of society is the place where those who suffer inequality, injustice and exploitation live their lives as well as those who are simply "born poor," without the resources of the middle class. People at the margin do not have either voice or status to make their experience count. Often they lack power and access to many resources. A small group of people in positions of influence, the insiders, control the decisions and shaping of society.

           The marginalized, the outsiders, see the world differently particularly in terms of justice and power. They have to respect the rules and privileges of insiders yet they know these do not apply to their own lives. Outsiders speak both languages: that of the insiders and their own. Insiders know only their own language because it gets them all they need. 

Nowhere is the authenticity of marginal knowledge more evident than in the gospels. There the early Christian community remembers the ways that Jesus heard the voices of outsiders and validated the truth of their experiences. According to the gospel writers, Jesus both allowed the marginalized to speak their truth, and he also experienced that truth by being marginalized himself (Jane Kopas, p.117).
           Both women and men suffer similar kinds of exclusion through illness, poverty and lack of social status. But women suffer double exclusion, through female "uncleanness", economic dependence upon a husband or son, marital status, education, religious standing, and relationships. Women in the gospels were able to speak both the language of the oppressor and the oppressed. Jesus frequently responded to them and used their voices to speak to the hardened of heart.

           One can be an outsider in a number of ways: economically, politically, religiously, sociologically or sexually. Jesus exemplified outsider status in a number of ways. Some of these were: 

  • the non-traditional source of his ideas, his place of origin: What good can come from Nazareth? --Jn 1:42,
  • his anti-establishment role as a poor person with no power base, 
  • the fact that he chose outsiders as his friends and associates, and finally 
  • his death as an outsider.
Regardless of illness, poverty, social status or occupation, Jesus assisted outsiders to discover for themselves personal values that transcended the accepted standards of worth set by the guardian insiders. Perhaps the most profound aspect of his life was his identification with the outsiders, all the "poor" of his society. The opening words Jesus selected to describe his mission, which he chose from Isaiah 61, seem enormously significant:

The Spirit of the Lord has been given to me,
 for he has anointed me. 
 He has sent me
 to bring the good news to the poor,
 to proclaim liberty to the captives
 and to the blind new sight
 to set the downtrodden free
to proclaim the Lord's year of favour. (Luke 4:18)

           If we read the gospels from the point of view of the outsider status of the poor, the ill or diseased, the religiously ostracized or those excluded socially or politically, we can see not only how Jesus continually made himself vulnerable, but also how he calls upon the excluded "poor" for an understanding and wisdom not available to the insiders.

           According to the perceptive exposition of Kopas, each of the four gospels presents the outsider in a different context:

     The financially poor were a primary category, comprising 98% of the inhabitants of Jesus world. They were either poor peasants living in fishing or agricultural villages and working class labourers living in the few pre-industrial cities. Beggars and slaves were the most marginalized. In Luke's gospel one finds a number of examples of the voices of the poor challenging the understanding of insiders, particularly widows (Lk 7:11; 21:1, 18;1). It is instructive to read Luke for examples of hearing the truth that the poor have to speak. We discover outsiders know many things the insiders do not. We learn we cannot celebrate in good conscience without considering the plight of those who are outside the celebration (Lk 14:12). The poor find their experience confirmed and the non-poor discover they need to keep on listening to the poor.

     During Jesus' time, illness and disease were seen as the result of sin or the punishment of God. Avoidance of others for fear of contamination as well as lack of mobility and energy made the sick truly "outcasts." Those most in need of consolation were the most deprived of it. Mark's gospel offers many examples of this exclusion: dreaded skin disease (Mk 1:40), paralysis (Mk 2:1), demonic possession (Mk 5:1), female disorders (Mk 5:25), and blindness (Mk 8:22).
   Many exclusions exist today: victims of environmental diseases (compounded by the lack of response from the "insiders"), the impoverished ill and elderly, those imprisoned, millions in nursing homes, and particularly those with AIDS. Most of these are also compounded exclusions by their status or social ostracism, or lack of access to even pastoral help today.

   Matthew's gospel seems to highlight those excluded because of religion: ritual impurity (Mt 23:25), lack of perfect observance of the Law (Mt 12:1), association with unacceptable people (Mt 9:10), and gender inferiority (Mt 5:31). Religious authority of the time assumed that external requirements were a sign of the quality of a persons' relationship with God. In Matthew's gospel, Jesus confronted that posture continuously. He also deliberately associated with those who were considered outsiders: tax collectors, sinners and outcasts (Mt 9:10). He demonstrated that all outsiders: tax collectors, prostitutes, children and women have access to the Kingdom. Even more than access he highlighted that fact that they have particular experiences that open them to the power and the truth of God.

   Besides the economical, physical and religious forms of exclusion, John's gospel demonstrates examples of the politically and socially excluded. Jesus conversation in particular with the Samaritan woman of dubious reputation (Jn 4) contrasts with the dialogues Jesus has with men. The interplay between "Jerusalem" and those outside the power centre: Galileans and Samaritans is prevalent. Most people in our world are politically marginalized.

           What is the particular wisdom of the poor? They perceive the pretensions, vanities and games of the insiders, the inevitable blindness of those in power, how self-righteous and closed they are. Outsiders can more easily recognize their own complex vulnerability and thus a greater need for interdependence. They know that all security given by the world or others is illusory. They know that their safety cannot come from social status, health, wealth, or even religion. They know the good things of life belong to all and can never be enjoyed by excluding others. They, above all, know how fickle is the "good fortune" of the day. Because of their precarious vulnerability they can more easily grasp that their most unshakeable identity comes only from God's unconditional acceptance which they are constantly invited by their circumstances to model. Thus they are easily generous with the stranger. They comprehend that this kind of living somehow connects them with a larger Mystery of Divine Hospitality. The point is not that all outsiders accomplish this, but it is more possible than with those who must go through the "eye of the needle."

           Consider that we have often distorted the way of being Christian into a "salvation" exclusively for us, for our group of believers, and further, been ready to judge others as further from God because they do not hold the same beliefs. Rather than a dualistic acceptable/non-acceptable division of people, perhaps the unique way of being Christian has more to do with total equality of discipleship, and that each of us can learn from another, no matter how divergent the path, history, experience, or sinfulness we confront. 

     Many Christians have no contact with these various classes of the "poor." Yet, often, they are all around us. Prophets measure the faith of the community by their care for and their acting justly with the poor.

Is this not the sort of fasting that pleases me-
-it is the Lord Yahweh who speaks--
to break unjust fetters 
and undo the thongs of the yoke,
to let the oppressed go free,
and break every yoke,
to share your bread with the hungry,
and shelter the homeless poor,
to clothe the man you see to be naked
and not turn from your own kin?
Then will your light shine like the dawn
and your wound be quickly healed over
Your integrity will go before you
and the glory of Yahweh behind you. 
Cry, and Yahweh will answer:
call, and he will say, "I am here'.
Your light will rise in the darkness,
and your shadows become like noon.
Yahweh will always guide you,
giving you relief in desert places.
He will give strength to your bones
and you shall be like a watered garden
like a spring of water
whose waters never run dry....
You will be called 'Breach-mender',
'Restorer of ruined houses.'
(Isaiah: 58, Jerusalem bible)
            We need the marginal for our salvation. We need to "rub shoulders" with the poor -- to be confronted with their poverty? Regular and sustained contact with the poor helps us remember who we are before God. When we are surrounded by middle class lifestyles it is too easy to forget that it is only God's grace and the unconditional love of other human beings that makes me who I am. Only in the face of poverty, or the possible loss of everything, can I realize that there is more to my life than my own hard work, achievement, family, status and prestige. This is why a severe personal crisis is for some the best thing that life can possibly bring them.

           Some personal crisis, confrontation with the dark Shadow side of personality, or being with the poor enables one to encounter one's own still existing place of personal poverty. The sort of people who were open to Jesus' message was seldom the insider, but more likely the marginal, the dispossessed, alienated, excluded, and the ostracized. To have a sense of one's own spiritual poverty is a powerful insight and grace that can open one to the power of God, particularly God's unconditional love. It enables one to escape the compulsive need to earn one's way to heaven and one's hidden and pervasive self-centredness.

           Can we accept the grace-ful-ness of our roles of being marginal, as an incentive for understanding the role of all the outcasts, as a spur for joining in prayerful solidarity with the marginal of the world, and, hopefully, becoming spokespersons for them to the principalities and powers of the world? Are we not called by Baptism to make ourselves vulnerable to others and their needs? Does Jesus measure our energy for the Kingdom by the extent we respond to the "poor," and are willing to live marginally ourselves?

           Our status as a marginal person can be a tremendous gift of grace that has given us perspectives we would never be capable of had we been insiders. By embracing the exile we share the dark journey with countless brothers and sisters. We can glory in our exclusion, as Paul gloried in his weakness, because of the many graces and insights it has brought us. When we are humanly weak, then are we strong in God (2 Cor 12:9). Strong also in gratefulness, hopefully also in humility, and in the giftedness of everything. Especially with the precious gift of faith, which transforms everything.

           Jesus of Nazareth took it upon himself to mediate Yahweh's healing to the poor and outcast. He unilaterally declared a Jubilee for those doubly oppressed by the symbolic order: the unclean were pronounced whole, the debt-ridden forgiven. And then he liberated Yahweh's presence from its controlled seclusion in the Holy of Holies, announcing that it dwelt among the people. The people could now eradicate debt by co-operating in a new community of sharing and forgiving; the people could welcome the impure and anoint the sick and cast out demons. Jesus role was to do away with priests, to radically democratize the body of Israel. The "blood of atonement" would no longer be a vicarious offering controlled by the temple stewards. The only acceptable sacrifice was that of one's own lifeblood, shed in service to the people and in resistance to oppressors. So Jesus embraced this priestly vocation: not to rule over, but to be "reckoned with the sinners," and in the end to "pour out his soul to death" (Is 53:12). --Myers, 445.

           Could it be that some condition of marginality -- either economic, political, social, physical, religious or sexual -- is necessary for the emergence of radical discipleship? For the apostles and the early church, the experience of marginality was an intrinsic step for genuine conversion. Without some kind of hardship or setback, few persons will be open to the radical invitation of Jesus, and few will discover the profound beauty of Life and deep laughter of soul offered by faith and the grace of unconditional love.

        The movement of the Spirit is always on the margins. There is no other place to look... all other issues are secondary. God is not only out on the margins. God is the margin.

          Some questions facing gay persons who desire spiritual growth are these: Can I accept the grace-ful-ness of my role of being marginal, as an incentive for understanding the role of other outcasts; as a spur for joining in prayerful solidarity with the truly "poor" of the world, as a call to humble service that does not depend upon being an insider, and, hopefully, when led, becoming spokesmen for others without voice to the principalities and powers of the world? 

          It is particularly difficult for we GLBT persons to accept and, in addition, to embrace our position on the margin. In fact much of our city life customs is geared to making us an insider group and to put others on the margin. Accordingly some gays try to keep out bi's and separate themselves from lesbians to whom they "campily" refer as "dykes" just like any other insider heterosexual male.

           Our need to be accepted and to win respect is so great that we buy into a high middle-class lifestyle -- designer clothes, designer apartments, plush condos, specialized food. Many of us advocate, support our very own queer culture from within which we can look down upon and marginalize all those who do not belong to it. Advertisers know that there is a lot of money among GLBT people who belong to our queer culture and they go after this money by mainlining the culture's more glittering and superficial lifestyle. In some crazy way we do unto others as they have done unto ourselves.

           What makes the need to belong to the inner circle more intense is the need to establish our human rights. We have learned to deal with the system in  the way the system has taught us -- by establishing strong and vociferous lobby groups, by use of the courts and intelligent use of the media, and the writing explicitly into law of our civil rights as citizens of our respective countries. As a result, in many North American places, we have been able to prevent discrimination on many significant fronts.

           However when it comes to developing a spirituality there is a big BUT.  In the process of establishing our rights with the equality and respect we deserve, we have had to act like the inner group. In this process we might lose our solidarity with those people on the margin and in turn oppress others in the way we have been oppressed. Is it not a sociological fact that, after one set of immigrants get themselves established and improve their lot by getting better jobs and positions, they turn around and prevent other people from entering into our country, getting better jobs and housing. "... And the beat plays on!"

          I repeat the point that was made above ---

           Could it be that some condition of marginality -- either economic, political, social, physical, religious or sexual -- is necessary for the emergence of radical discipleship? For the apostles and the early church, the experience of marginality was an intrinsic step for genuine conversion. Without some kind of hardship or setback, few persons will be open to the radical invitation of Jesus, and few will discover the profound beauty of Life and deep laughter of soul offered by faith and the grace of unconditional love.
     How can a disciple of Jesus maintain the needed solidarity with those on the margin while at the same time exercise his/her skills which appear to make him/her part of the insider group. Did not Jesus say: "Blessed are the poor in spirit...." and "Blessed are those who fight for justice...."?
-- Justin McBride
The Original References In The Article
From Which This Was Adapted

Evely, Louis. That Man is You, Newman. 1964 
Jane Kopas, Outsiders in the Gospels, The Way, 33:2 (April 93), 117-126. 
Bernie McGoldrick. personal letter. 2/5/94 
Ched Myers, Binding the Strong Man. Maryknoll, Orbis, 1991. 
Elaine Prevallet. 
Reflections on Simplicity. Pendle Hill Pamphlet 244. 
Metz, Johannes. Poverty of Spirit. Paulist, 1968. 

Other relevant articles by Paschal Baute (send SASE...)

Patriarchy is a Black Walnut Tree
How free are you of Patriarchical Influence? 
Ministry as a Spirituality of Partnership 
Righteousness is a Horse Named Trojan 

(the influence of personality type in  Catholic/Christian
loyalties and the sacred necessity of Dissent) 
The Divine Poetry of the Erotic and Left-Handed Shepherds 
What it means to me to be Catholic today

 
Each of the following articles may help to further  explore themes similar to those in the above article: 


Return To Homepage